You are here: Home : CFO Magazine : January 2008 Issue : Article
Carbon Trading
(continued)
At Entergy, conducting a carbon inventory is a fairly straightforward affair. For starters, Entergy generates a good deal of its electricity from nuclear generators, which do not produce any CO2. Moreover, nearly 95 percent of the company's CO2 discharges come from its own smokestacks.
The more diverse the businesses, however, the more complicated carbon reporting becomes. At IBM, managers conduct regular reviews of direct and indirect emissions (that is, those from purchased electricity) during the year. About two months after the company's fiscal year ends on December 31, managers begin rolling up the energy-use and emission-inventory numbers, a process that takes about six weeks. IBM's energy use accounts for about 90 percent of its greenhouse-gas emissions, and Big Blue collects actual-energy-usage data from more than 85 percent of its owned and leased space. Edan Dionne, IBM's director of corporate environmental affairs, says the company files its yearly North American inventory with the Department of Energy and the Chicago Climate Exchange, a voluntary carbon commodity trading system. It also sends a full global report to the Environmental Protection Agency's Climate Leaders program and the not-for-profit Carbon Disclosure Project.
Such reports may help ensure that IBM gets credit for early actions if Congress mandates carbon reductions. Still, critics point out that most U.S. businesses set relative — and not absolute — carbon-reduction targets. Typically, the goals are tied to key performance indicators, such as revenues or units sold. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, for example, expresses its CO2 emissions in terms of thermal units per $1,000 of net sales. That's understandable, given that the coffee purveyor is growing at a 30 percent annual clip. But it's unclear what effect — if any — relative CO2 reductions will have on global warming. "I did suggest an absolute CO2 reduction once," says Paul Comey, vice president of environmental affairs at Green Mountain. "But our operations people nearly went into shock." — J.G.
advertisementTo see "Accounting for Waste" — a list of entities providing greenhouse-gas credits, and reporting standards underpinning such offsets — click here.
- Readers' Comments
- What individuals can do on a daily basis?
Posted by Ajith Sankar | January 21, 2008 09:39am
- Paper used in office
Posted by Raman Rajagopal | January 11, 2008 06:16am
- Good Information
Posted by Louisa Nara | January 08, 2008 11:00am
Related Articles
- Chief Carbon Officer
October 01, 2007
- Carbon Emissions and the Bottom Line
April 01, 2007
- View from Europe: Global Warming's Cost
February 01, 2007
- More Companies Cutting Greenhouse Gases
December 28, 2006
- The Carbon Economy
November 01, 2006
Inside the January 2008 Issue
Cover Story
- Carbon Trading Set for Takeoff
Features
- Small Business, Big Problems
- Foreign Intelligence
Also Inside
- Letter from the Editor, January 2008
- Letters to the Editor, January 2008
- Long Live the King?
- IFO Sightings
- Bring Your Own Pretzels
- A Meter for Meetings
- And Not a Moment Too Soon
- Saving Face Time
- Virtuality Check
- Business Outlook Survey
- View from China: Growing out of Control
- The Emergence of Convergence
- A Hedge-Fund Mystery
- Lessons from Adversity
- Koch Industries's Steve Feilmeier
- Why VSOE Spells Trouble
- Gaming the System
- Lifting the Handicap
- Conference Confidential
- Refusing to Roll Over
- A Loss Worth Reporting
Related White Papers
- Managing Risk through Better Financial Planning
- SEC Filings, XBRL and Annual Reports: The Business Case for Automated External Financial Statement Reporting
- Travel & Entertainment Expense Management: Reduce Processing Costs & Improve Policy Compliance
- One Touch Business Travel and the End of the Expense Report
- SOX Optimization Plan
We Deliver
advertisement
advertisement


Video
