You are here: Home : CFO Magazine : January 2008 Issue : Article
Carbon Trading
(continued)
John Goff is technology editor at CFO.
The Invisible Inventory
Scoping Out a Carbon Accounting System
While Congress debates exactly how to tackle global warming, many businesses are already preparing for coming federal limits on carbon emissions. For most companies, the first step in the process involves performing a greenhouse-gas inventory.
advertisementThis is no small task. To begin with, businesses must choose how to conduct the carbon accounting. There's no shortage of advice on that score. The list of CO2 reporting protocols includes ISO 14064, the Voluntary Carbon Standard, and the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. Outside of the ISO checklist, none of the protocols appears to be nearly as rigorous as GAAP. The GHG Protocol, devised by a coalition of businesses, government agencies, and pro-green groups, seems to be as much guidance as standard. "It's deliberately broad," explains Emilie Mazzacurati, an analyst at research firm PointCarbon. "They want it to cover as many types of projects and companies as possible."
That may explain why so many U.S. corporations seem to be gravitating toward the GHG Protocol. The standard addresses three areas of emissions. Scope 1 covers direct emissions of six greenhouse gases from things like factory furnaces and boilers. Scope 2 includes indirect emissions — that is, purchased electricity. For now, reporting on Scope 3 discharges (downstream and upstream releases of greenhouse gases) remains voluntary. Says Mark Newton, environmental policy manager at Dell Computer: "The GHG Protocol fairly narrowly scopes to facility and facility manufacturing."
Assessing the carbon emitted outside a company's factory walls poses a number of challenges. Little information is available from the many links in a company's supply chain, and assigning responsibility for emissions can prove tricky. "If everybody counts Scope 3 emissions," says Mazzacurati, "you'll end up with a lot of double-counting."
Most advise starting small. At Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, managers confined the initial inventory to plant operations, then later expanded the inventory to include regional operations, corporate and employee travel, and, more recently, logistics and fulfillment. "Don't do everything in a year," advises Paul Comey, vice president of environmental affairs at the coffee maker. "You'll bury yourself."
Don't expect precise numbers, either. Nancy Hirshberg, vice president of natural resources at yogurt specialist Stonyfield Farm, notes that some of the numbers are hardly rock solid. "Carbon footprinting isn't that advanced," she says. "You have to estimate a fair amount. It's not worth taking extra time and money to try and get actuals." — J.G.
Emission Statement
Businesses struggle to document cuts in CO2 discharges.
Brent Dorsey doesn't mince words. When asked about the need to rein in carbon emissions, the director of environmental programs at New Orleans–based utility Entergy says flat out: "We are the poster child for the physical risks that climate change can bring."
Entergy actually began reducing its carbon output years before Hurricane Katrina devastated the company's service area, which includes Louisiana and Mississippi. Since 2000, the company has slashed its yearly greenhouse output by nearly a third, getting it close to 1990 levels. Entergy has made improvements to its own generation facilities, but a key aspect of its improved carbon profile stems from its power purchases from merchant generators. By shopping the market, Entergy has been able to sign up with generators that produce energy more efficiently. To assess and report on reductions in emissions, the company adheres to the GHG Protocols, methodologies promulgated by the World Resources Institute and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
- Readers' Comments
- What individuals can do on a daily basis?
Posted by Ajith Sankar | January 21, 2008 09:39am
- Paper used in office
Posted by Raman Rajagopal | January 11, 2008 06:16am
- Good Information
Posted by Louisa Nara | January 08, 2008 11:00am
Related Articles
- Chief Carbon Officer
October 01, 2007
- Carbon Emissions and the Bottom Line
April 01, 2007
- View from Europe: Global Warming's Cost
February 01, 2007
- More Companies Cutting Greenhouse Gases
December 28, 2006
- The Carbon Economy
November 01, 2006
Inside the January 2008 Issue
Cover Story
- Carbon Trading Set for Takeoff
Features
- Small Business, Big Problems
- Foreign Intelligence
Also Inside
- Letter from the Editor, January 2008
- Letters to the Editor, January 2008
- Long Live the King?
- IFO Sightings
- Bring Your Own Pretzels
- A Meter for Meetings
- And Not a Moment Too Soon
- Saving Face Time
- Virtuality Check
- Business Outlook Survey
- View from China: Growing out of Control
- The Emergence of Convergence
- A Hedge-Fund Mystery
- Lessons from Adversity
- Koch Industries's Steve Feilmeier
- Why VSOE Spells Trouble
- Gaming the System
- Lifting the Handicap
- Conference Confidential
- Refusing to Roll Over
- A Loss Worth Reporting
Related White Papers
- Managing Risk through Better Financial Planning
- SEC Filings, XBRL and Annual Reports: The Business Case for Automated External Financial Statement Reporting
- Travel & Entertainment Expense Management: Reduce Processing Costs & Improve Policy Compliance
- One Touch Business Travel and the End of the Expense Report
- SOX Optimization Plan
We Deliver
advertisement
advertisement


Video
